BicoinZ's admin Explain to someone "Scam"

Fairbot:

[discord] Hello Dear Sirs of isthiscoinascam !

First of all congratulations for your platform, it would be very helpful for the people to have a fast impression for each crypto project, since the scams and fraudsters in this world are  the grand majority unfortunately.

Our project, BITCOINZ , is a 100% Community Driven project with ZERO premine/pre-ownership, NO ICO sales, NO instamine period, NO forkdrops, NO speculative fast halvings or any other that could act as a factor of unfair practice to anyone who might wish to join our network.

We are a pure Proof of Work crypto like was meant to be the original Bitcoin , with the difference that BITCOINZ is offering much higher speed and scalability, almost zero fees because of its higher supply and most importantly :  ZK snarks cryptography (optional privacy) and Z-Hash , an ASIC resistant algorithm that makes it mine-able only by small miners , blocking the ASIC miners that only very rich people can obtain. 

This is why the founders had chosen this BITCOIN+Z name since, it honors the fundamentals of the original BITCOIN and adds anything that was missing !

Please notice that BITCOINZ had its own genesis block, it is not a fork of the BITCOIN , trying to take advantage of its users by gifting free coins to BTC holders with forkdrops , like all the Bitcoin-named forks did!

We are a 4 years old project and maybe the oldest BITCOIN named coin together with Bitcoin Cash (which was a fork of BITCOIN though).

[discord] <VandarGR> Indicatively we would like to mention that ETH had 70% pre-ownership, BNB 100% pre-ownership, ADA 100% pre-ownership NEM 100% pre-ownership

We are writing this email because we have noticed that the BITCOINZ profile is incomplete with info missing and a general situation where important aspects like all these we have mentioned to you are not taken into account at all for the "SCAM" scores of each asset.

You claim that the user can see if a crypto is fair or a scam but there are no mentions to the most important things like : their premine level, if they act as central authority with coin burns or by issuing coins to their founders addresses,if they had an ICO or not (86% of all ICOs were scams according to the biggest research that has been done for this - by Sherwin Dowlat & Michael Hoddap) etc

How is it possible coins that the 100% of its supply was allocated to its founders addreses scoring with a "GREAT"  and a project like BITCOINZ that has a scam-proof recipe in all its fundamental rules with 0 % to its founders being presented as "POOR"?

You even seem to not taking into account even the comments of the people who many times comment with very negative comments under "GREAT" according to your platform projects and with very positive comments under "POOR" projects.

We are waiting for your answer in order to understand and thank you for your time in advance